Opening GPAtlas…

🌊 The Ocean Library · GP clinical topic

Non-hormonal Contraception

Reviewed and updated by practising UK GPs, overseen by our Clinical Advisory Officer.

🧭 When to consider non-hormonal contraception

Non-hormonal contraception prevents pregnancy without exogenous hormones. It is relevant whenever a patient:

• Prefers to avoid hormones

• Has a contraindication to hormonal methods (for example migraine with aura, previous venous thromboembolism (VTE), or current/past breast cancer – all UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC) 3 or 4 for combined hormonal contraception (CHC))

• Is breastfeeding

• Wants a method they control

• Needs protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs)

The methods divide into three groups:

• Barrier (condoms, diaphragm/cap)

• Fertility awareness (including lactational amenorrhoea)

• Copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD)

They differ enormously in effectiveness: the Cu-IUD is the only non-hormonal method that is "fit-and-forget" and over 99% effective, whereas barrier and fertility-awareness methods are user-dependent, so their real-world (typical-use) failure rates are far higher.

Match the method to what matters to the patient while being honest about typical-use effectiveness – and recognise the situations where a low-efficacy method is simply not safe enough (a condition where pregnancy is dangerous, or a teratogenic drug).

Method Failure rate per year (perfect → typical use) Protects against STIs?
Copper IUD (Cu-IUD) < 1% → < 1% No
External (male) condom ~2% → ~18% Yes
Internal (female) condom ~5% → ~21% Yes
Diaphragm or cap (+ spermicide) ~6% → ~17% No
Fertility awareness (taught, symptothermal) < 1% → up to ~25% No
Lactational amenorrhoea (all criteria met) ~1% → ~2% No
Spermicide alone (not advised as sole method) ~18% → ~28% No

Perfect-use figures are best-case; typical use is what most people actually achieve. Fertility-awareness effectiveness is especially training-dependent – well-taught, motivated couples do far better than the upper typical-use figure suggests.

⚠️ Common pitfall

• Treating "no hormones" as "low stakes".

• A patient who chooses condoms or fertility awareness while taking a teratogen (sodium valproate, isotretinoin) – or who has a condition where pregnancy itself is dangerous (UKMEC 4) – is inadequately protected.

• These situations need a highly effective method (usually a long-acting reversible contraceptive, LARC), whatever the patient's wish to avoid hormones.

• Always check the drug chart and UKMEC before agreeing to a low-efficacy method.

Source: FSRH · UKMEC 2025


🔒 Sign up free to read the full topic

You're viewing a free preview. Create a free account to unlock the rest.

Sign up free →
Inside the full topic 🔒 History🔒 Red Flags🔒 Examination🔒 Patient Explanation🔒 Investigations🔒 Management🔒 Non-pharmacological Treatment🔒 Pharmacological Treatment🔒 Special Notes & Safeguarding🔒 Referral Pathways🔒 Take Home Messages

Sample topics are open to everyone in the Free Sample Bundle.

Part of The Ocean Library, 450+ structured clinical topics mapped to the primary care curriculum. Companion audio in Echo · one-page summary in The Scope.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, provide personalised content, and analyse our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy policy